Terrorism & Islamic
Doctrine

|
On March 6, 2008, a terrorist targeted a school in
Jerusalem and opened fired with a machine gun killing 8 students
while wounding 9 others. Yitzhak Dadon, a Jewish student who
heard the shots coming from the school, waited outside for
the the terrorist to come out, and when he did, the student shot
the terrorist twice in the head, killing him. A week later the
official Palestinian Authority newspaper described the
terrorist, Ala Abu Dhaim as a "Groom" which is an expression for
"martyr." |
An examination of Islamic doctrine
from both the Quran, and Hadith in order to see if it agrees with
terrorism.
Various governments like the United States describe terrorism
in this particular way, "the unlawful use of
force or violence
against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the
civilian
population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political,
religious, or social
objectives." There
are valid points
in there which are true, but to add something further to get the whole
picture; "Terrorism is use to further one's
political,
religious, or social means, as a result of not having a military strong
enough
to carry out it's objectives."
Bin Laden known as a "jihad terrorist", who continues to make his presence
known described the motivation for his cause on a audio tape. In November 2002. "Speaking in a literary style of Arabic
favored by Bin Laden, the voice said the attacks were
''carried out by the zealous sons of Islam in
defense of their religion,'' and that they were
a reaction to what ''(President) Bush, the pharaoh of this age, was doing in
terms of killing our sons in Iraq, and what Israel, the United States' ally, was
doing in terms of bombing houses that shelter old people, women and children.''
CAIR: Bin Laden's Public Relations
Agency
Those who
disbelieve in GOD, after having acquired faith, and become fully content with
disbelief, have incurred wrath from GOD. The only ones to be excused are those
who are forced to profess disbelief, while their hearts are full of faith.
The Quran: Revelation 16:106
CAIR is an agency that supposedly defends the
rights and interests of the Muslim community in the United States but in reality
the facts say otherwise. In 1998, CAIR fought to remove billboards in some LA
counties that were depicting Bin Laden as an enemy of the United States. CAIR
claimed it was offending to Muslims and was encouraging racism. CAIR also
claimed Bin Laden had nothing to do with the twin East African embassy bombings
and in September 2001, CAIR declared Bin Laden had nothing to do with the World
Trade Center attacks, but in December 2001 CAIR admitted Bin Laden's
involvement. CAIR routinely sides with Bin Laden and other terrorists around the
world unless those those radicals say something contrary. Take the 1993
conviction of Omar Abdel Rahman for example, who planned to blow up New York City's
landmarks. CAIR of course called that an act of "injustice" of the law against Muslims.
President Bush and Islam
Since the
terrorists attacks conducted upon the United States during 9/11, we have
witnessed President Bush, declaring at such places as the Islamic
Center in
Washington DC on Sept 17, 2001, "The
face of terror is not the true faith
of Islam. That's not what Islam is all about. Islam is peace. These
terrorists
don't represent peace. They represent evil and war."
In a Joint
Session to Congress on Sept 20, 2001, President Bush continued his
theme of
Islam being a religion of peace by declaring to congress and the
nation, "We
respect your faith. It is practiced freely by many millions of Americans,
and by
millions more in countries that America counts as friends. Its
teachings are
good and peaceful, and those who commit evil in the name of
Allah blaspheme
the name of Allah."
President Bush describes Islam as a
"peaceful religion", and not only that but he goes on to say it's teachings are
agreement with God... Islamic doctrine
is not good as
President Bush points out, because it's teachings are contrary to what
the Bible
teaches...One of the main reasons for painting a positive
image of
Islam, was the fear of a possible backlash by the American public
or the United States government when it became
known, the terrorists were Arabs who practice Islam...
This fear was propelled in the
public spotlight in June 2002, when Commissioner Peter Kirsanow in Detroit
said, "If there's another
terrorist attack, and if it's from a certain ethnic community or certain
ethnicities that the terrorists are from, you can forget civil rights in this
country," A week
later, Kirsanow apologized for his outburst and said his comments were
taken out of context. He doesn't believe in detention camps, he insisted, nor
should the Bush administration consider them."
Most of the
mainstream media in America
agreed with President Bush's theme on Islam...Contrary to the popular
belief with some Muslims which claims all media outlets in the United States are
bias against Muslims, there was however,
many articles
displaying how peaceful Muslims are especially in their
own community...Even my local newspaper publishes a Muslim writer in it's
editorial section on a regular basis, alternating with other professional
editorial writers. This was unheard of before Sept 11, 2001...Like President Bush, they were
concerned about a possible backlash by the American
public so they went out of their way to paint Islam in a positive light.
Months following the terrorist
attacks of September 11, 2001, many
Muslims around the world in general, have been placing themselves as the
doctrine of Islam,
quoting the Quran in such places as Sura 2:256...and use themselves as an example on behalf of other
Muslims...Yet, justify such attacks because the US supports Israel, and claim
desperate people do desperate things when oppressed...They cry out, "if only the
Jews would leave the Palestinian land, there would be peace." They claim
similar things about Kashmir as well...
Is Islam a peaceful religion? Is
President Bush,
and the rest of the mainstream media and Muslims who firmly want us to believe in this
particular theme
right, or wrong? Let's examine both the Quran and the Hadith
very
carefully in order to see if Islam agrees with terrorism...The Quran
states,
and I quote, "Let there be no
compulsion in
religion” 2:256...Many Muslims will
use Sura 2:256, and
quote history...
The doctrine of Abrogation is one of the
most important doctrines when it comes to understanding Islam
"And for whatever
verse we abrogate and cast into oblivion;
We bring a better or the like of it;
knowest thou not that God is powerful over everything?
Sura 2:106
Abrogation basically means in Islam, is that
the newer Suras
which are better than the older Suras, are to be be obeyed. While the older
Suras are not to be obeyed, if there is a conflict
of commands
between them...
The importance of this particular doctrine of
abrogation cannot be
understated. In a mosque in the city of Kufa, Ali b. Abi Talib, one saw
people
gathering around the judge, Abdur-Rahman. The judge was
confusing that which is
permissible with that which is not. Ali asked him whether he
could tell the abrogative
verses from the abrogated; he said that he could not. Ali then
grabbed the man's
ear, twisted it, and said: "you perish, and you make others
perish. Do not judge
in our mosque anymore."
Since we now know understand the doctrine of Abrogation in Islam and it's
importance, a question should arise..."Are there any
verses that are
newer than Sura 2:256 in the Quran? As we examine the
various texts from the Quran, the answer is "yes"...Let's look at the newer verses....
"Make war on them until idolatry shall cease and
God’s religion shall reign supreme" Sura 8:39
"Fight in the cause of Allah those
who fight you, but
do not transgress limits, for Allah does not love transgressors".
Sura 2:190
"And slay them (the infidels) wherever you catch them, and turn
them out from
where they have turned you out, for tumult and oppression are worse
than
slaughter" Sura 2:191
"And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression,
and there
prevail justice and Faith in Allah; but if they cease, let there be no
hostility
except to those who practice oppression". Sura
2:193
This may surprise some people but in the beginning of Islam, the Jihad, was not allowed....No Muslim at
this time
was commanded to take up arms against his enemy...But these newer verses
changed this whole concept completely, and gives Muslims the right
of
self defense, or to wage war against nations which it has no treaty
with...
More quotes from the Quran
include,
"Seize them and slay them wherever you find them: and in any case take no
friends or helpers from their ranks." Sura 4:89
"Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor
hold that forbidden
which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor
acknowledge the
Religion of truth, from among the People of the Book, until they pay
the Jizyah
with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." Sura
9:29
"And an announcement from Allah and His Messenger,
to the people (assembled) on the day of the Great Pilgrimage,- that Allah and
His Messenger dissolve (treaty) obligations with the Pagans.
If then, ye repent, it were best for you; but if ye turn away, know ye that ye
cannot frustrate Allah. And proclaim a grievous penalty to those who reject
Faith." Sura 9:3
Here we see in Sura 9:29, the Quran ordering Muslims to fight in order to
establish Allah’s kingdom on earth (all of the earth) by any means.
Most Islamic
scholars are in agreement that one verse of the Quran (9:5)
abrogates 124
verses, which are basically all the verses that talk about peace and
forgiveness. Speaking of Sura 9:5, here it is, and I quote...
"But when the forbidden
months are past, then fight and slay the pagans wherever
ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them
in every
stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular Prayers
and
practice regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is
Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful" Sura 9:5
As we see clearly in this verse (which is commonly called the verse
of the
sword) there is only one way out for pagans (or infidels) to be spared
from
being slain and that is they should repent, and that is; to begin
establishing prayers, and
practice charity, or in other words, become a Muslim...As for people
of the book we
read the verse in the same sura which tells us the way out of being
killed
"until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission and feel
themselves subdued." Jihad terrorists believe in these verses of the Quran
to the letter...
A collection of books known as the
Hadith, which were
written by Muslim scholars in attempt to record Islamic history and the
prophet
Muhammad. The Hadith is in agreement with the
Quran on violence, and
establishing an early kingdom...
For example, it states and I quote,
"Ibn Haban in
his Sahih, vol. 14, p. 529, narrates: Muhammad said: "I swear by Him who has my
soul in his hands, I was sent to you with nothing but
slaughter." In his Musnad (vol. 2, p. 50) Imam Ahmed
narrates by Ibn Omar: "the Prophet said: "I
was sent by the sword proceeding the judgment day and my
livelihood is in the
shadow of my spear and humiliation and submission are on those
who disobey me."
Omar Ibn al-Khatab said:
"I heard the prophet of Allah
saying: ‘I will cast Jews and Christians out of the peninsula and I won’t
leave
any one in it but Muslims.’" (Sunan Abu Dawud, vol. 2, No. 28,
from the
Muhaddith program[2]). Ibn Ishaq and al-Waqidi report that the
prophet
said the morning after the murder (of Kab Ibn al’Ashraf), "Kill any
Jew you can
lay your hands on." (El
beddayah wa alnihaya – Ibn Katheer – vol. 4 – in the
chapter on killing Ka’ab bin al’Ashraf).
The third and final question we are going
to look
at is, "Did major
Muslim figures impose what we previously viewed in the
Quran and Hadith?
The answer is clearly "yes" for example, Tarik, a Muslim
leader who lead the conquest of Spain
addressed his troops in 711. This motivational speech to his
troops shows
how establishing an early kingdom as taught in the Quran and Hadith
was to be accomplished in Islam...
Tarik
states, "The Commander of
True Believers,
Alwalid, son of Abdalmelik, has chosen you for this attack from
among all his
Arab warriors; and he promises that you shall become his comrades
and shall hold
the rank of kings in this country. Such is his confidence in your
intrepidity.
The one fruit which he desires to obtain from your bravery is that the
word of
God shall be exalted in this country, and that the true religion shall be
established here. The spoils will belong to yourselves."
Some if not most Islamic terrorists, will
use this very
style used in Tarik's speech to motivate their followers to kill
themselves and
others around them. Many Muslims would argue since the
conquest of Spain
by Tarik, there was more freedom of religion for a time, than when Christianity
was in control...They are incorrect, it wasn't Christianity rather it was a
church/state, religion, in Spain who were doing the persecuting and then
murdering those outside the state religion. This church/state religion is known
as the Roman Catholic Institution.
There is no commandment in the New Testament doctrine
for Christians to conduct force conversions on those outside of Christianity,
nor a commandment using the government to spread Christianity by force. The
Christian church is suppose to conduct itself in a civil manner according to
Scriptures, by only preaching the Gospel to those who are unsaved, nothing more.
Now back to the issue at hand.
Another example is Muhammad himself. The most
important prophet in Islam...Before the Hadith was written, there was another
book written by Ibn Ishaq about Muhammad's life...The book is called, "Sirat
Rasulallah" which is considered to be the most authentic biography of Muhammad.
There is an event in there that we should take note of on page 515. It
occurred about 3 years before Muhammad's death. This event has to do with
Muhammad's conquest of Khaibar, a large Jewish settlement.
It had one of the best palms in the area as well as
prosperous merchants, craftsmen, and farmers. There was a certain treasure
brought to Muhammad's attention. Muhammad then asked about it. But
Kinana denied that the treasure actually existed. Muhammad then says, "Do
you know that if we find you have it I shall kill you?" he said "Yes." Muhammad
gave orders that the ruin be excavated and some of the treasure was found.
Kinana continued to be unwilling to reveal where any of
the treasure was. So Muhammad gives orders to al-Zubayr Al-Awwam, "Torture
him until you extract what he has." So he kindled a fire with flint and steel on
his chest until he was nearly dead. Then Muhammad delivered him to Muhammad b.
Maslama and he struck off his head.
Is this an indication that Islam is a "peaceful
religion" as President Bush, and Muslims all over the world like to put it as or not? It's very
clear, the answer is a resounding "no." All of the answers to the above question
comes from doctrine, and
practice of Islam and Muslim scholars themselves. Their fruits indicate without question
to it's intention,
point out that Islam is not
a peaceful religion. But does that mean, all Muslims are not
peaceful people? The answer is; yes and no. Yes, Muslims do have a goal to establish an earthly
kingdom through various means even through violence...However, having said that
there are Muslims who would live peacefully with others, even though they
differ in religion but believe Allah's kingdom will be established mainly
through peaceful conversions to Islam...Sadly though, a Muslim has no peace with God.
Let me explain this to you even further,
firstly, Muslims in general, are in dire need of
God's gift,
which is, salvation through Christ and Christ alone (John
6:37,65). Not a form of
works and self redemption
through a formula of certain religious laws with the prospect of never knowing if your saved or not...Secondly,
some Muslims will in fact
give excuses for the terrorist activities conducted in such places as
the Middle
East, even the attacks of Sept 11, however, they
wouldn't perform those acts of evil
themselves...And finally, there are
some Muslims who condemn completely the notion of any type of
terrorism...
Let's conclude now on a positive
note
which is the only
hope a person has, no matter what race, religion, a person has, and
that is....
May God open their
hearts up to the
Gospel according to His Will!
Terrorism and
Islamic Doctrine: Part 2: Six Years Later